Add to Netvibes

Microsoft Planning Another Yahoo Run

Sometimes we just cant let dead horses lie. Thats okay, neither can Microsoft. After months of more drama than a daytime soap (ahem) with the attempted merger/acquisition of Yahoo, Microsoft pulled their offer back in May. And now theyre saying, Whoopsiedoodle. On second thought...

Yahoo RunYahoo Run

...we will be coming back fighting. The Wall Street Journal reports today that Microsoft is planning another run at Yahoo"and this time they wont be going it alone. Theyre actively looking for partners to dismantle Yahoo. Current candidates include News Corp. (aka Nick on Y&P) and Time Warner (we may call him . . . Tim. Hes Alan (AOL)s dad).

This isnt exactly good news for already-beleaguered Yahoo chief, Jerry Yang. But the WSJ article presents a very different image of Yang than the one portrayed in recent lawsuits and power plays at the company.

Carl Icahn and several other stockholders have gone to great lengths to show Yangs personal animosity towards Microsoft, which they believed was the main impediment to a deal. However, the WSJ article and its inside sources show a Yang who tried to drive a favorable bargain for his company and was ultimately very disappointed in the way the negotiations turned out:

When Mr. Ballmer explained that Microsoft was withdrawing its offer, Mr. Yangs face fell, according to a person who was present.

Microsoft and Yahoo have already been in talks with News Corp and Time Warner/AOL throughout this year. Will one of them finally be able to reach a deal"and if so, who will be left standing?

Comments

Tag: , ,

Add to Del.icio.us | Digg | Reddit | Furl

Have a bookmark! -

Google Explains How to File Re-consideration Request!

Over at the Google Webmaster Central Blog, Google has put up a valuable post, that every Webmaster should definitely go through. In the post, Google has explained in length how...

...Webmasters can determine the factors, that would lead them to file a reconsideration request to Google in case their website gets banned. It also shows (via a video) the method of filing the reconsideration request through Google Webmaster Tools.

It can happen to anyone at anytime, that your website might disappear from the Google Search Results. One of the possible reasons for this to happen is that, Google has stopped indexing your website altogether. In such a case, you can always file a reconsideration request to Google via the Webmaster Tools. Watch the video below, to understand the correct procedure, that you should follow while filing a reconsideration request.


However, you first need to be absolutely certain that Google has deliberately stopped crawling your website. Follow the below mentioned checklist to make sure that there aren't anomalies that are hindering the indexing of your website:

Check for access issues: One of the reasons that your website might stop getting indexed is if your website is facing any access issues. It means that, the Google crawlers aren't able to crawl your website due to unavailability of the site. You can check for access issues by logging in to your Webmaster Tools account. There in the 'Overview' page, you'll be able to check as to the last successful crawl made by Googlebot of your home page. You can also check for any crawling errors that the Googlebot might have faced. For example, if your server was busy or unavailable when we tried to access your site, you would get a "URL unreachable" error message. A more common error can be that some pages could be blocked by a robots.txt file. You can see this in "URLs restricted by robots.txt". If there are URLs listed there which you did not expect, you can go to Tools and select "Analyze robots.txt" - there you can make sure that your robots.txt file is properly formatted and only blocking the parts of your site which you don't want Google to crawl.Check for messages: If you do not find any access issues, then you should head over to the Message Center of your Webmaster Tools account to check for any unread message from Google. The message center is, where Google sends important information regarding your Webmaster Tools account and the websites that you manage through that account. If Google finds something in your website that does not adhere to its Webmaster Guidelines, then Google will intimate you with a message, asking you to make certain changes in your website, to bring it in compliance with Google Webmaster Guidelines.Go Through the Google Webmaster Guidelines: If you find none of the above two issues with your website, then you need to go through the
Google Webmaster Guidelines, to observe if your website at any point of time has violated the Google Webmaster Guidelines.
Make Corrections: In case if you do find your website in violation of the Google Webmaster Guidelines, then you should promptly fix the issues that have caused the de-indexing of your website.Submit a Reconsideration Request: Now that you've made the necessary changes to your website, it is time to submit the reconsideration request to Google. Log in to your Webmaster Tools account. Under Tools, click on "Request reconsideration" and follow the steps. Make sure to explain what you think was wrong with your site and what steps you have taken to fix it. Once done, you will then receive a message from Google (in your Message Center, of course!). Google will confirm the receipt of the reconsideration request, after which it will review your website and would check whether your changes are consistent with Google Webmaster Guidelines.

It is not too difficult to submit a reconsideration request to Google, but it is always better to double check your facts before, asking Google to re-index your website, when Google never de-indexed it.

Comments

Tag:

Add to Del.icio.us | Digg | Reddit | Furl

Have a bookmark! -

Microsoft Still Pines for Yahoo!

Microsoft still wants to purchase Yahoo!, however, now their true intentions are becoming more visible: Theres yet another chapter in whats beginning to look like an eternal corporate...

...love triangle: Seems Microsoft just cant get past its obsession with Yahoos search business, at least according to The Wall Street Journal.

It reports Microsoft is looking to team up with News Corp. or Time Warner to buy Yahoo. They would then bust up the company with Microsoft keeping the search business.

The idea that Microsoft might team up with News Corp or Time Warner, regardless of the new relationship with online ad revenue sharing with Google, to buy Yahoo! might help with Carl Ichans quest to sell Yahoo!

The other new order of business is that the Google Yahoo! agreement might be up for review, not by the SEC, but by the Justice Department:

Googles proposed deal with Yahoo is being looked at by the Justice Department because of antitrust issues and many Yahoo shareholders would like to see Microsoft move in.

From Information Week:

When the deal was announced, Google and Yahoo said they had agreed to delay it for three months to allow the Justice Department time to review the arrangement. It may be that the investigation is nothing more than the governments acceptance of that invitation. Indeed, thats how Google sees it.

In an e-mailed statement, Google said, We are continuing to have cooperative discussions with the Department of Justice about this arrangement and voluntarily delayed implementation for three and a half months in order to give them time to understand the agreement. That process is continuing exactly as expected. We are confident that the arrangement is beneficial to competition, but we are not going to discuss the details of the process.

But according to the Post, the formal investigation undertaken by the Justice Department represents more significant scrutiny than the sort of pro forma review that the two companies appear to have anticipated.

Whatever the case, Google has already weathered a similar antitrust review as a consequence of its decision to acquire DoubleClick.

What are your thoughts?
Will, or should the Google-Yahoo! deal go through?
Will, or should Microsoft keep up efforts to purchase Yahoo!?
Does it even matter anymore?

Comments

Tag: , ,

Add to Del.icio.us | Digg | Reddit | Furl

Have a bookmark! -

BBC Busts Out Top Level Domain Name News

by Sage Lewis

The BBC reports a complete internet overhaul with relaxed rules for the previously restricted .com's, .net's, .org's, etc. Google's Inside AdWords blog announces an Ad Planner to assist you with every aspect of your media campaigns, and Yahoo! kills a free keyword research tool offered through Overture. Sage also reports on increased local and global online advertising, with funds reaching $13.1 billion spent locally and estimated to exceed $106 billion globally by 2011.


Want more from your web site?
Search Influence can help! Targeted Traffic. Increased Revenue. Results Guaranteed. Customized Internet Marketing you can afford.

Stop Wasting Your ALT Attributes and Make them Work for You

by Stoney deGeyter

When providing SEO advice on the topic of website design, we often warn against placing important content into images. This is because search engines can't read images like a person can. To them, an image with text is just an image. They really have no idea what the image is or if, in fact, it says anything at all. So when optimizing sites, anytime we are dealing with keyword optimized content, we want to make sure it's standard HTML text. This includes headers, benefit lits, and even normal body copy.

While the search engines can't read actual images, they can read what we say about the image. This information can be gleaned a few different ways:

Image file name (image1234.jpg vs. mustang-gt.jpg) Text immediately surrounding the image The overall content of the page the image is on Image ALT attribute in the image tag

When trying to optimize images for image search, all of these can provide important indicators the search engines use to produce the best set of image results. In terms of traditional optimization and website usability, the ALT attribute plays an important role.

The ALT attribute is an image descriptor

The ALT attribute should by no means be considered a substitute for regular text. ALT text doesn't get weighted as heavily as body text so relying on it as a replacement for body text is like entering a Prius into the Indy 500. It doesn't have a chance.

Ok, so that was a bit of an exaggeration, but you get my point. There are effective uses of the Image ALT attribute when it comes to SEO and usability. Let's start by looking at an image tag with the ALT attribute:

<img src="images/image.jpg" alt="This is the ALT attribute" />

Almost universally, you should be using ALT text to describe each of your images. I say "almost" because if you are still using clear images for formatting, styling, or spacing (you shouldn't be!) then those images don't need any description. As a side note, if you want your HTML to validate properly then every image needs an ALT attribute, even if it's left empty:

<img src="images/spacer.gif" alt="" />

In some cases, the ALT text can act as a replacement for the text in an image, such as a company name, tagline or some kind of special promotion, and in other cases the ALT text should actually describe the image. In either case, if the image contains text, then you will almost always want to put it in the ALT attribute as well.

For example, the logo in my company site is really nothing more than just the words "Pole Position Marketing" with my tagline.

Pole Position Marketing logo and tagline

I could go a couple of different ways with the the construction of the ALT attribute, depending on the context of how it's used. Here, since I'm using the image as an example, it's not important for me to use much more than a basic description:

alt="Pole Position Marketing logo and tagline"

But on my own website, since this isn't jut an image in the body copy, but one of my key site indicators, I produce a much more complete description:

alt="Pole Position Marketing: Velocitize Your Website Marketing"

Now, if I wanted to be even more descriptive, and more accurate, I'd write my alt tag this way:

alt="Pole Position Marketing logo: Velocitize Your Website Marketing"

Again, I let the context be the guide for what I write in my ALT text. If the reader, with images turned off, won't know that the image is a logo then I'd add that to the description. But since this image appears repeatedly at the top of the page, in the typical place that logos and/or other site indicators go, then I really don't need the additional description.

Describe your image meaning

Let's look at another example. Here is an screenshot of an image-heavy home page:

Snapshot of image-heavy web page

Now, when we look at this same page with the images turned off you can see how that by not using any image ALT attributes the site becomes unnavigable.

Snapshot of page with images turned off

The only place you can see any ALT text is in the logo, which reads "Super 8 Taos". The rest of the site is just a big jumble of images, some of them links and some not.

[Note: you can mouse over any of the images on this page to check out my ALT text usage for each.]

As you can see above, ALT text becomes even more important when navigating a site with images turned off when the navigation is all image based. Let's add some ALT text to these images and see what we get:

Snapshot of page with ALT attributes added

The header and navigation are pretty obvious. Here we simply added the same words that are in the image. Again, since this is obviously navigation we really don't need to describe the images, so much as just reiterate what they say. This allows the visitor to know where each link will take them, just as if images were turned on.

You can see that I didn't bother adding ALT text to any images that didn't serve a function beyond eye-candy. There really is no reason to attempt to describe them in any way, so in these cases I would just add an empty ALT attribute, as shown above, just so the code will validate.

In the center area I got a bit creative with my ALT text. Even for less image-heavy websites, this is a great example of how to use ALT attributes for images that attempt to convey meaning without words.

We could attempt to describe the pictures perfectly by saying something like, Picture of our room, picture of the bay, picture of downhill skier. While those are accurate descriptions they don't convey the intended meaning that you get when you actually see the image. So in this case we'll use the ALT attribute to try and get some of that intended meaning across:

alt="All of our rooms are comfortable and spacious with living room seating and ceiling fans."

alt="You can reserve a suite featuring breathtaking ocean views."

alt="We are only minutes from some of the worlds best ski resorts."

With images like this you can get a bit more or less flowery, depending on your needs. It also makes it easier to work keywords into the ALT text without looking junky. Instead of just throwing a keyword in every image, describe the image a bit and work the keyword in naturally. Just like you would with body text.

Considerations for SEO and usability

It's easy when SEOing a website to just throw a quick word or two into your alt images, but that's a mistake. Even in your navigation the ALT text can be used to expand on a links meaning when there is not enough image space to do so.

For example if the image reads "About Us" the ALT attribute can say "Learn more about our company." If the image reads "Accommodations" the ALT text can read "Deluxe accommodations." If your image reads "FAQs" then the ALT text can spell it out with "Frequently asked Questions."

When dealing with navigation you want to be careful about how many words you use. Too much and you lose the ability to be effective, especially with quick scans. Always check what your page looks like with images turned off, ensuring that your ALT tags flow well with the rest of the site design. On my site I edited my ALT attributes specifically to provide better usability with images turned off. Here is what my site's top navigation looks like with images:

Pole Position Marketing Navigation with Images

The drop downs are all absolutely positioned so if I had made any of these ALT descriptions longer then the drop downs would have been been misaligned. By editing my ALT text properly, we keep proper alignment.

Pole Position Marketing Navigation without Images

Just to provide one more example of good ALT attribute usage, I've added ALT text to the Better Business Bureau logo on our site. Instead of just saying "BBB Accredited Business" I added a more lengthy description that reads:

alt="We are a Better Business Bureau accredited business. Click here to check our BBB rating."

This text much more valuable to the reader that has images turned off.

I should also note that Internet Explorer will display the ALT attribute when you mouseover an image. FireFox, on the other hand will only display text that is in the image's title attribute. If you are adding great descriptive text in your ALT attribute as I have shown here then it's probably a good idea to also place that text in a title as well.


Want more from your web site?
Search Influence can help! Targeted Traffic. Increased Revenue. Results Guaranteed. Customized Internet Marketing you can afford.

4 Tips to Making Your Proprietary CMS Search Friendly

by Manoj Jasra

There are often cases where a business will choose to develop a custom content management system (CMS) rather than buying something off the shelf. I have some first hand experience building my own content management system and can testify that if it's implemented corrrectly it will rank as well as any commercial CMS powered website. The key to a developing a good CMS is to first understand the purpose of your website (requirements) and secondly to design the framework (database, business logic, GUI) to support it. There are also some fundamental SEO related guidelines you should build into your proprietary CMS if you hope to rank well in the search engines.

  Unique Meta Tags: Each page on your website should allow for unique meta tags. This will keep your site away from any supplemental index issues and allow you to rank for a broader range of keywords.
URL Rewriter: Stay away from dynamic URLs/querystring variables to load content, static URLs are the only way to go. Keywords in the URL are an important ranking factor so make sure to use relevant kewyords in your static URLs. Creating static URLs often requires parsing your URL for keywords so that you can query your database for the correct content.
Links: To help search spiders easily crawl throughout the site, add the ability to have unique links within the body content and footer. Implementing a strategy such as bread crumb navigation (with keyword rich anchor text) is both useful for crawlability and search engine rankings.
Content/Keyword Insertion: Not only should your content be unique for each page, you should also allow for your CMS to dynamically insert relevant keywords into your content for image alt tags, links, page copy, and meta tags.


Want more from your web site?
Search Influence can help! Targeted Traffic. Increased Revenue. Results Guaranteed. Customized Internet Marketing you can afford.

My Linked Data Planet Keynote (Updated with missing link)

I've finally found a second to drop a note about my keynote.

The keynote: Creating, Deploying, and Exploiting Linked Data, sought to achieve the fundamental goal of: Demystify the concept of "Linked Data" using anecdotal material that resonates with enterprise decision makers.

To my pleasure, 90% of the audience members confirmed familiarization with the "Data Source Name" concept of Open Database Connectivity (ODBC). Thus, all I had to do was map "Linked Data" to ODBC, and then unveil the fundamental add-ons that "Linked Data" delivers:

The ability to give database records names (Identifiers) The use of HTTP in the database record naming mechanism - which expands a named database record's reference scope via the expanse of the Web (i.e HTTP based Identifiers called URIs).

I believe a majority of attendees came to realize that the combination above injects a new Web interaction dynamic: access to "Subject matter Concepts" and Named Entities contained within a page via HTTP base Data Source Names (URIs).

BTW - My presentation is a Linked Data Space in it's own right courtesy of the Bibliographic Ontology (which provides slide show modeling) and RDFa that allows me to embed annotations into my Slidy based presentation :-)

Related PowerPoint version of Presentation Slideshare hosted version Authorstream hosted version Google Docs hosted version

Context, Tagging, Semantic Web, and Linked Data (Updated)

Courtesy of Nova Spivack's post titled: Tagging and the Semantic Web: Tags as Objects, I stumbled across a related post by John Clarke titled: Tagging and the Semantic Web. Both of these posts use the common practice of tagging to shed light on the increasing realization that "The Pursuit of Context" is the fusion point between the current Web and its evolution into a structured Web of Linked Data.

How Semantic Tagging Works (from a 1000 feet)

When tagging a document, the semantic tagging service passes the content of a target document through a processing pipeline (a distillation process of sorts) that results in automagic extraction of the following:

-- Named Entities -- Subject matter Entities (Subject matter Concepts reflecting topics covered by the document

Once the extraction phase is completed, a user is presented with a list of "suggested tags" using a variety of user interaction techniques. The literal values of elected Tags are then associated with one or more Tag and Tag Meaning Data Objects, with each Object type endowed with a unique Identifier.

Issues to Note

Broad acceptance that: "Context is king", is gradually taking shape. That said, "Context" landlocked within Literal values offers little over what we have right now (e.g. at Del.icio.us or Technorati), long term. By this I mean: if the end product of semantically enhanced tagging leaves us with: Literal Tag values only, Tags associated with Tag Data Objects endowed with platform specific Identifiers, or Tag Data Objects with any other Identity scheme that excludes HTTP, the ability of Web users to discern or derive multiple perspectives from the base Context (exposed by semantically enhanced Tags) will be lost, or severely impeded at best.

The shape, form, and quality of the lookup substrate that underlies semantic tagging services, ultimately affects "context fidelity" matters such as Entity Disambiguation. The importance of quality lookup infrastructure on the burgeoning Linked Data Web is the reason why OpenLink Software is intimately involved with the DBpedia and UMBEL projects.

Conclusions

I am immensely happy to see that the Web 2.0 and Semantic Web communities are beginning to coalesce around the issue of "Context". This was the case at the WWW2008 Linked Data Workshop, I am feeling a similar vibe emerging from the Semantic Web Technologies conference currently nearing completion in San Jose. Of course, I will be talking about, and demonstrating practical utility of all of this, at the upcoming Linked Data Planet conference.

Related My Data Space Tag Cloud (*a Linked Data Space*) Faviki (note: this service needs to expose Linked Data compliant Tag URIs) MOAT Ontology

 
/dokuwiki/data/pages/start.txt · Last modified: 2008/07/02 18:29 by webmissile
 
Recent changes RSS feed Creative Commons License Donate Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki